Ahead of federal budget, hopes high for boosting high-tech job skills, expertise
Many are hoping the upcoming federal budget will help post-secondary students land real-life experience in emerging fields.
OTTAWA—Expectations are running high that next week’s federal budget will provide a more detailed federal strategy — and perhaps more cash — to help post-secondary students land real-life work experience in emerging, employee-starved fields.
In last year’s budget, Ottawa committed $73 million over four years to fund an initiative aimed at ensuring that what’s being taught inside the classroom is better aligned with the tech-related needs of the job market.
Specifics have yet to be released, but the government plans to launch the program this year — and advocates will be watching the March 22 budget for signs of a framework.
“Students today want to get their hands dirty as part of the university experience,” said Universities Canada president Paul Davidson, noting there have been good discussions about work-integrated learning over the past year.
“There might be some amplification of it in the budget; there might be an extended commitment to it.”
Read more:
Last year, the government set aside money for new co-op placements and work-integrated learning in anticipation of a program to encourage participation in “high-demand fields,” such as science, technology, engineering, mathematics and business.
The feds billed it at the time as part of a broader plan for a so-called “innovation agenda,” a strategy to foster the growth of young, high-potential firms in Canada and encourage talented graduates to stay in the country.
The government is counting on that strategy to help drive Canada’s long-term economic growth.
Finance Minister Bill Morneau’s second budget comes amid growing awareness that a wide range of today’s jobs will eventually be replaced by the rapid advance of new technologies, such as automation and artificial intelligence.
The Liberal government has spent more and more time in recent weeks talking about the need to address the evolving labour market, as well as the importance of finding ways to increase participation in the workforce.
Job skills will be “one of the key areas of focus” in the budget, Morneau said last week.
“I’m confident that we’ll help Canadians get the skills they need in a challenging economic environment,” he said.
“We’ll be thinking about not only how we can grow the economy, but how we can ensure that Canadians are prepared for the exciting and good opportunities that will come out, not only for this generation, but for the next generation as well.”
Dan Kelly, president of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, said he hopes Ottawa’s efforts will also acknowledge and help the more informal skills-boosting approaches relied upon by small- and medium-sized companies.
There’s rarely any government support for those firms that enlist existing staff members to show young or inexperienced workers the ropes, such as teaching them to use a piece of equipment, Kelly said.
Ottawa does, however, provide considerable support for formal skills training through the Canada Job Grant, through employment insurance measures and by way of transfer payments to the provinces for university and college funding, he added.
Canada’s smaller firms — 75 per cent of the country’s companies have fewer than five employees, Kelly noted — are often ill-equipped to take advantage of federal grants because there’s so much paperwork.
“If there are some budget measures to facilitate informal, on-the-job training, we would certainly be a cheerleader for that.”
However, there are growing calls for the government to first figure out precisely what credentials the job market is looking for.
Otherwise, Canada could find itself with too many people with skills that the market doesn’t need, said Nobina Robinson, CEO of Polytechnics Canada, a national organization representing public colleges and polytechnics.
“I certainly believe that we should have more education that leads to employment — work-integrated learning helps that, no question,” Robinson said.
Robinson said she wants to see improvements in Canada labour-market data, something the federal government’s influential advisory council on economic growth pushed for last month in its latest recommendations.
The council, led by McKinsey & Co. global managing partner Dominic Barton, has already helped guide Ottawa in shaping policies.
“Governments, academics, and others have long recognized the need for more timely and reliable labour market information,” said the Barton report, which described the data as “disorganized” and a challenge for policy-makers.
Davidson, whose organization represents 97 institutions, said only about 55 per cent of university students have some form of co-op or internship and he’d like that number to reach 100 per cent.
He’s also expecting work-integrated learning to emerge as a priority when a federal panel of youth-employment experts release their findings in the coming weeks.
“There seems to be momentum around this,” Davidson said.
Comment:
"The upcoming federal budget and GTA construction workers
White collar / Blue collar
I recall reading a few weeks ago that the upcoming federal budget will contain policy changes concerning foreign workers.
This past week, Ottawa leaked the attached story about investing in white collar training.
The comments from Dan Kelly of the independent business federation are telling. Kelly expresses frustration with Ottawa’s apparent never ending refusal to recognise the blue collar sectors.
Ottawa has clearly decided that it will never get a handle on turning out the trades workers required by Canadian industry.
This leaves the trades sectors relying on foreign workers.
Next week is Ottawa’s last opportunity to create a legal GTHA construction work force by significantly easing up on the anti-blue collar LMIA process.
My guess is that Ottawa will go through the motions of throwing a few insignificant LMIA related scraps to the GTHA construction sector. Even then, the impact of the changes will wither in the bureaucrat administration dead zone
If I’m right, the GTHA construction sector will have three options:
Option #1: Lose big money by waiting in vain for government to be rational
Option #2: Try and find more undocumented workers
Option # 3: Find workers in Europe and bring them in legally ASAP
- Option #1 is never a viable consideration.
- Option #2 is no longer viable because truly qualified trades workers will no longer come to Canada on an illegal basis
- Option #3: This is the only viable path.
In the face of the construction sector’s anticipated determination to source and legalize its workers, government will have three options of its own:
LEAD, FOLLOW OR GET OUT OF THE WAY
Practically speaking government has confirmed that it is unwilling to lead.
Thus, government has only two options:
Follow or get out of the way
Let the games begin."
Richard Boraks, March 15 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment