Harvard Economist: 42 Percent of Immigrant Households on Public Assistance
People walk through New York's Chinatown district on July 11, 2014 in New York City. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
A Harvard economist has found that nearly 42 percent of immigrant households in the United States are on public assistance of some kind.
“In 2016, there were 8.9 million households headed by a non-citizen … almost 42 percent of those households received some type of assistance,” George Borjas, Professor of Economics and Social Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, wrote on his website on Feb. 1.
To come to his conclusions Borjas used census data from 1994 to 2016 to calculate how many of the migrant-headed households receive either money, food stamps, or Medicaid.
According to Borjas, millions of households could be impacted if existing immigration laws are adhered to.
Borjas noted that since 1882, the United States has banned the entry of immigrants who could potentially become a “public charge,” meaning they will likely need government-funded assistance.
The law states the following:
Any alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible.
The law was later modified to make it possible to deport immigrants who had become a public charge after entering the country:
Any alien who, within five years after the date of entry, has become a public charge from causes not affirmatively shown to have arisen since entry is deportable.
(Gborjas.org)
However, according the definition used by the Department of Homeland Security, “public charge” only refers to receivers of cash benefits, and not to those who receive other benefits such as Medicaid, food stamps, housing benefits, etc.
Recently, there have been unconfirmed reports swirling around about the Trump administration potentially rolling out restrictions on immigrants who fall into this category.
The White House has yet to confirm the authenticity of the alleged new immigration orders.
The source:http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2220786-harvard-economist-42-percent-of-immigrant-households-on-public-assistance/
Comment:
"Canada immigration and the public purse
God bless America’s transparent immigration debate.
No matter how you chose to interpret the US facts, the bottom line is that America discloses its immigration relevant statistics. The attached welfare – landed immigrant facts are a case in point.
Meanwhile, I’ve never seen Canadian government stats linking the immigration selection process and public assistance. (But I did see the 2011 Fraser Institute report indicating that over $20 -$30 billion tax payer dollars ,annually, were wasted on recent immigrants).
Canadians are in no position to have a rational discussion on immigration selection until government opens its books on two sets of numbers:
- The retention rate of each class of immigrant/refugee
- The safety net money spent on each class of immigrant
Until Ottawa comes clean on the stats I see no reason to pretend that an adult discussion on immigration selection or a rational “pathway to citizenship “is possible. "
Richard Boraks, February 8 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment