Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Immigration: Language & Culture

My morning cup of coffee was curdled with an on line opinion piece from an analyst.

The analyst shall not be named. During the past decade, Ms. “no name” paid her bills by confusing conservatism with the previous government’s brand of tribalism.

In any event, Ms. “no name” stated unequivocally, this morning, that Canadian immigration must be culture based and that culture is language based.

Spooky as it is, the language–culture–immigration cult has a powerful following, especially among “pure laine” Francophones and third world Commonwealth paper pushers. Perhaps these are the folks who cannot compete unless they fix the rules of the game by making language perfection a nonnegotiable barrier.

There is no way that a cult will change direction. Evidence based discussion is a waste of time.

My suggestion is a compromise. There should be room in the immigration process for both the linguistic –cultural cultists and the economically driven tax payers.

But there should be no room for economic immigration programs that are culturally–linguistically based.

In true Maoist fashion, the past government bastardized the concept of economic immigration by demanding that language serve as the sole, non-debatable barrier in determining an economic applicant’s productivity. The result is French speaking cement finishers from the Congo looking for work in Toronto. They go on EI and then welfare because:

1. They can’t speak English, Italian or Portuguese
2. They can’t fathom how the cement business works in frost or snow

Meanwhile, European cement finishers with a decade of proven Canadian cement finishing experience get deported because they only write enough English to pay their taxes.

Let the cultural purists have their toy. Set up an immigration program for language and culture. But don’t let the cultists run the economic agenda.

Section 12 of IRPA belongs to those who want to build the country. The linguists should get their own section. But until they do, they should simply go away
Richard Boraks, February 9 2016

No comments:

Post a Comment